Remember, this is the man to watch.
From this point on, watch, very closely, where he rewrites as many points as he can into something he can attack. Those he does not rewrite, he mocks as "extremist". Those he neither rewrites, nor mocks, he attempts to discredit by a pseudo-religious doctrine that I'm not sure he understands himself. This type, right here, is the number one enemy on a forum already "enemy territory".

See, atheists can be debated, they can be argued with, and they can be open to the discussion - because they not only want to prove their beliefs correct, but challenge you in your own. This person wants neither. His goal, from the very, very beginning, is an in-your-face, no-holds-barred, brawl of religious sanctimony - under the guise of "persecuting intolerance". His goal was never, in any way, shape, or form, to propose "the right way". His goal was to make the position I took to look foolish, by any and all dirty tricks he could muster - regardless of the effect on the mantle of "religious authority" he picked up.

What makes these types so dangerous, is that you have to not only keep them from damaging you, and your own witness, but endeavor to keep the witness of Christianity in general from being soiled by ones like this, who think nothing of dumping a load of refuse all over it in the name of some supposed "defense" of it. It's utterly preposterous - and utterly sad to see.