Note the use of negative connotation words. "Shroud", "wheelchair" (even though he spelled it as two words :P)

From there, he goes into an attack on context and relevance, even though he doesn't say what is, or is not, relevant. Or, what it is supposed to be relevent to.

He has one, very small point, buried in this. The fact that I DID find a list of verses about "fools", from a search in proverbs. However, I will, and have, maintained, that that list was on-target for the discussion at hand - what was foolish. The entire, and I do mean entire book of Proverbs is completely, and totally, on the subject of Wisdom versus foolishness. That is the purpose of the entire book.

I'll also, however, maintain that it was dumb of me to list so many verses. That was used as the crux of the "you just post a bunch of verses, and you call that truth". Well, that, I proved false not even a page later. However, it kept coming back to that, mostly because JF found something he thought he could win on. For some reason. No clue why.. but he did. Because he keeps using it over, and over, and over, ad nauseum.