|
|
| 5DGVictorDavion |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 03:45 |
 |
|

The Wandering Thief-Wanderer of the Wanderers in uRO.
     
Group: Members
Posts: 5252
Member No.: 3342
Joined: 31-May 02


|
How would you describe creationism, and what is your opinion on it?
--------------------
 The password is "Who are the patriots" and "La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo" |
 |
| BlueMoonWolf |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 03:48 |
 |
|

Official Sense Knocker Iner (OSKI)
  
Group: Members
Posts: 263
Member No.: 7800
Joined: 15-July 04


|
Are you trying to start a brawl.
--------------------
I was a Creature before I could Stand -Slipknot |
 |
| silas_blue |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 03:51 |
 |
|

You talkin' to ME?
  
Group: Members
Posts: 1308
Member No.: 6989
Joined: 15-February 04


|
| QUOTE (BlueMoonWolf @ Nov 30 2004, 19:48) | | Are you trying to start a brawl. |
I think he is.
Just have Ah_Tze unlock the previous discussion thread and we can continue the topic.
Silas Blue
Lead Accordion player of the band 'Eloquent Spam' Bestowed Carrier of the Pink Flame (sry cr, kinsey 0) Loyal purchaser of Non-Symantec products "Trolling Scum" Memorable quote : "Shooting makes me feel better!" - Aeryn Sun
--------------------
 I aggress against Hawks and Crows. |
 |
| 5DGVictorDavion |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 03:57 |
 |
|

The Wandering Thief-Wanderer of the Wanderers in uRO.
     
Group: Members
Posts: 5252
Member No.: 3342
Joined: 31-May 02


|
No, I just want peoples opinions on Creationism and Evolution. Charles
Darwin was Christian, you know.
--------------------
 The password is "Who are the patriots" and "La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo" |
 |
| OMD |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 04:04 |
 |
|

Advanced Member
  
Group: Members
Posts: 77
Member No.: 8337
Joined: 28-October 04


|
since there are separate topics for both versions, there is no need for
any flames, not all people are pryomaniacs.
as for my current (and ever changing it seems) view of creationism, I point you in the direction of my thread. i think that the universe is self realising, god created the universe, then the universe created god.
edited for clarity
Edited by OMD - Dec 1 2004, 04:20
-------------------- Artist formerly known as hawkyboy. Hawk, Cam, Opheera McDoom, CEOs of Hawk Enterprises, because we care about money. |
 |
| 5DGVictorDavion |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 04:06 |
 |
|

The Wandering Thief-Wanderer of the Wanderers in uRO.
     
Group: Members
Posts: 5252
Member No.: 3342
Joined: 31-May 02


|
I have two topics, not one, which might eliminate the ridiculous idea
of trying to prove ones point when answering a simple question of "What
do you believe" not "Why should we believe what you believe"
Besides, Creationism doesn't necessarily say there is a God, it just says there is a possibility of synthetically creating life.
Ah, I love the English Language and all of it's loopholes and ambiguities.
I
believe Creationism can be proved possible. We just have to find a link
in every Y chromosome. (Saying that if every Y Chromosome of every male
on Earth is similar (30-50%, perhaps, I don't know.) Then we could know
if Creationism is possible
Edited by 5DGVictorDavion - Nov 30 2004, 21:19
--------------------
 The password is "Who are the patriots" and "La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo" |
 |
| DHG~Hydro |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:04 |
 |
|

Join the anti-CR League of Extraordinary Spammers today!
  
Group: Members
Posts: 969
Member No.: 5860
Joined: 11-October 03


|
Fish fossils located on mountains?
I wonder how they got up there...
-------------------- Secular rhetoric, neo-communist, braiwash/mind-control turd!
 |
 |
| 5DGVictorDavion |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:05 |
 |
|

The Wandering Thief-Wanderer of the Wanderers in uRO.
     
Group: Members
Posts: 5252
Member No.: 3342
Joined: 31-May 02


|
The Flood?
--------------------
 The password is "Who are the patriots" and "La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo" |
 |
| Orogogus |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:09 |
 |
|
Advanced Member
  
Group: Members
Posts: 331
Member No.: 5519
Joined: 27-August 03

|
No, tectonic drift. Everyone does believe in that, right?
And
in answer to the question, I think there are at least two different
definitions of creationism. One is that a creator was responsible for
creating life, and another takes it further and says that a creator was
responsible for creating each species individually. I tend to be
undecided on the first, and don't believe in the second. |
 |
| DHG~Hydro |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:09 |
 |
|

Join the anti-CR League of Extraordinary Spammers today!
  
Group: Members
Posts: 969
Member No.: 5860
Joined: 11-October 03


|
| QUOTE (5DGVictorDavion @ Dec 1 2004, 01:05) | | The Flood? |
Exactly.

There you go, apart of the bible is accounted for. Leaning more towards creationism.
as for the whole atheist and theistic evolutionary concepts.. I must admit that I am stumped lol.
Edit: I don't see how exactly that accounts for such, Oro.
Edited by DHG~Hydro - Dec 1 2004, 01:16
-------------------- Secular rhetoric, neo-communist, braiwash/mind-control turd!
 |
 |
| 5DGVictorDavion |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:15 |
 |
|

The Wandering Thief-Wanderer of the Wanderers in uRO.
     
Group: Members
Posts: 5252
Member No.: 3342
Joined: 31-May 02


|
| QUOTE (Orogogus @ Nov 30 2004, 23:09) | No, tectonic drift. Everyone does believe in that, right?
And
in answer to the question, I think there are at least two different
definitions of creationism. One is that a creator was responsible for
creating life, and another takes it further and says that a creator was
responsible for creating each species individually. I tend to be
undecided on the first, and don't believe in the second. |
Wouldn't Everest be an archeological haven to all sorts of sea life?
Since India and Asia came together right there?
--------------------
 The password is "Who are the patriots" and "La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo" |
 |
| OMD |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:21 |
 |
|

Advanced Member
  
Group: Members
Posts: 77
Member No.: 8337
Joined: 28-October 04


|
but it can also be explained through techtonic drit... the problem with
the past is that multiple versions can explain observed data equally
well, deciding on which you accept is all faith.
btw with the flood, why did the fish stay on the mountains when the water levels dropped? why
did god wipe out the entire planet just to destroy humans? he has the
ability to be very precise in his slaughterings, eg 1st born in egypt.
while
i dont know what to believe, i do believe that the bible is nothing
more than a collection of storys, while the message of the bible may or
may not be true, the text itself is almost certainly a work of fiction.
-------------------- Artist formerly known as hawkyboy. Hawk, Cam, Opheera McDoom, CEOs of Hawk Enterprises, because we care about money. |
 |
| OMD |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:23 |
 |
|

Advanced Member
  
Group: Members
Posts: 77
Member No.: 8337
Joined: 28-October 04


|
| QUOTE (5DGVictorDavion @ Dec 1 2004, 06:15) | | Wouldn't Everest be an archeological haven to all sorts of sea life? Since India and Asia came together right there? |
think water pressure and glaciation, things move the planet is dynamic.
-------------------- Artist formerly known as hawkyboy. Hawk, Cam, Opheera McDoom, CEOs of Hawk Enterprises, because we care about money. |
 |
| DHG~Hydro |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:25 |
 |
|

Join the anti-CR League of Extraordinary Spammers today!
  
Group: Members
Posts: 969
Member No.: 5860
Joined: 11-October 03


|
| QUOTE (OMD @ Dec 1 2004, 01:21) |
btw with the flood, why did the fish stay on the mountains when the water levels dropped? why
did god wipe out the entire planet just to destroy humans? he has the
ability to be very precise in his slaughterings, eg 1st born in egypt.
|
God
destroyed the earth with the flood and basically started over with the
humans. The humans at that time had perverted themselves into
wrongdoings or not following God's laws.
How did the fish stay on the mountains? Heh, rocks, crevices.. I'm sure there would be many other reasons.
Most fish fossil locations are next to rivers and oceans, anyway. Very few are on mountains.
Edit:
I was watching the science channel on the flood. It took it in an
atheist manner, but nevertheless. It explained that the Ice age had
left over gigantic built up blocks of ice in the north pole and south
pole.. and a global warming happend just at the right time... bam..
catastrophic flood. And they said that is why so many texts like the
Bible account for a "world wide flood."
Edited by DHG~Hydro - Dec 1 2004, 01:28
-------------------- Secular rhetoric, neo-communist, braiwash/mind-control turd!
 |
 |
| OMD |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:28 |
 |
|

Advanced Member
  
Group: Members
Posts: 77
Member No.: 8337
Joined: 28-October 04


|
that doesnt explain why the flood, we know that he can target just
people. so why destroy the planet because of one species?
-------------------- Artist formerly known as hawkyboy. Hawk, Cam, Opheera McDoom, CEOs of Hawk Enterprises, because we care about money. |
 |
| NS13 Vertigo |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:30 |
 |
|

Even Less l33t
  
Group: Members
Posts: 1187
Member No.: 1248
Joined: 20-September 01


|
| QUOTE (DHG~Hydro @ Dec 1 2004, 06:09) | | Edit: I don't see how exactly that accounts for such, Oro. |
The idea itself is pretty simple. We have our little fishy who, for
some reason or another, croaks in a good place. Fishy eventually gets
his little corpse covered up by silt/soil. Now, we must assume that
Fishy died in a VERY good place right now because he must magically
climb a mountain. This is done by making the tectonic plates move. As
the plates move, stuff from the ocean gets either pushed up or under
another plate. We're assuming Fishy is on the ascending plate. So,
anyway, over a very long period of time, the plates shift enough for a
mountain to form. Say it's a pretty high mountain for the moment. Also
during this time, our little water-based buddy fossilized. Thus, the
fossil in the mountain.
You'd think this'd be a pretty rare
thing, but due to the nature of the extinction of life in the ocean
(near-instant throughout the ENTIRE ocean and almost complete for a
number of species) there were actually a LOT of fishies in very good
spots.
Or at least how the idea goes. We can't exactly give
mouth-to-mouth to Fishy, so I can't interrogate him. Bet he went great
with soy sauce, though.
-------------------- -Mektek Politics: Because nobody really gets it. -"That was interesting. But dropping a warship on me is cheating...take it back!" - Id |
 |
| DHG~Hydro |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:38 |
 |
|

Join the anti-CR League of Extraordinary Spammers today!
  
Group: Members
Posts: 969
Member No.: 5860
Joined: 11-October 03


|
| QUOTE (NS13 Vertigo @ Dec 1 2004, 01:30) | | QUOTE (DHG~Hydro @ Dec 1 2004, 06:09) | | Edit: I don't see how exactly that accounts for such, Oro. |
The
idea itself is pretty simple. We have our little fishy who, for some
reason or another, croaks in a good place. Fishy eventually gets his
little corpse covered up by silt/soil. Now, we must assume that Fishy
died in a VERY good place right now because he must magically climb a
mountain. This is done by making the tectonic plates move. As the
plates move, stuff from the ocean gets either pushed up or under
another plate. We're assuming Fishy is on the ascending plate. So,
anyway, over a very long period of time, the plates shift enough for a
mountain to form. Say it's a pretty high mountain for the moment. Also
during this time, our little water-based buddy fossilized. Thus, the
fossil in the mountain.
|
Thanks for explaining, but what if we could prove that the earth is
only 6k years old?
Can the whole tectonic shift work within that timeline?
Wouldn't it take a couple of millions of years?
maybe even BILLIONs?
-------------------- Secular rhetoric, neo-communist, braiwash/mind-control turd!
 |
 |
| 5DGVictorDavion |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:44 |
 |
|

The Wandering Thief-Wanderer of the Wanderers in uRO.
     
Group: Members
Posts: 5252
Member No.: 3342
Joined: 31-May 02


|
| QUOTE (OMD @ Nov 30 2004, 23:21) | btw with the flood, why did the fish stay on the mountains when the water levels dropped? why
did god wipe out the entire planet just to destroy humans? he has the
ability to be very precise in his slaughterings, eg 1st born in egypt. |
By the way, I'm looking foward to the special about the death of Ramses
that will be on the Discovery Channel.
--------------------
 The password is "Who are the patriots" and "La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo" |
 |
| NS13 Vertigo |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:46 |
 |
|

Even Less l33t
  
Group: Members
Posts: 1187
Member No.: 1248
Joined: 20-September 01


|
| QUOTE (DHG~Hydro @ Dec 1 2004, 06:38) | | QUOTE (NS13 Vertigo @ Dec 1 2004, 01:30) | | QUOTE (DHG~Hydro @ Dec 1 2004, 06:09) | | Edit: I don't see how exactly that accounts for such, Oro. |
The
idea itself is pretty simple. We have our little fishy who, for some
reason or another, croaks in a good place. Fishy eventually gets his
little corpse covered up by silt/soil. Now, we must assume that Fishy
died in a VERY good place right now because he must magically climb a
mountain. This is done by making the tectonic plates move. As the
plates move, stuff from the ocean gets either pushed up or under
another plate. We're assuming Fishy is on the ascending plate. So,
anyway, over a very long period of time, the plates shift enough for a
mountain to form. Say it's a pretty high mountain for the moment. Also
during this time, our little water-based buddy fossilized. Thus, the
fossil in the mountain.
|
Thanks for explaining, but what if we could prove that the earth is only 6k years old?
Can the whole tectonic shift work within that timeline?
Wouldn't it take a couple of millions of years?
maybe even BILLIONs? |
I
think you'd find that devilishly difficult to do, but you're pretty
much right, from what I know. It -would- take a very long time to go
through all the way. If the Earth was only six thousand years old, I
don't think the theory would work out. I follow the billions of years
old theory, though, so for me it all fits.
And before we get too
deep into this, I think I should admit that I -really- don't think
you're going to be able to change my opinion here. I can do discussion
just fine, but doing a debate is just gonna devolve into us bashing our
heads against respective brick walls.
Edited by NS13 Vertigo - Dec 1 2004, 06:46
-------------------- -Mektek Politics: Because nobody really gets it. -"That was interesting. But dropping a warship on me is cheating...take it back!" - Id |
 |
| DHG~Hydro |
| Posted: Dec 1 2004, 06:49 |
 |
|

Join the anti-CR League of Extraordinary Spammers today!
  
Group: Members
Posts: 969
Member No.: 5860
Joined: 11-October 03


|
| QUOTE (OMD @ Dec 1 2004, 01:28) | | that doesnt explain why the flood, we know that he can target just people. so why destroy the planet because of one species? |
OMD:
Do I look like God to you ?
-------------------- Secular rhetoric, neo-communist, braiwash/mind-control turd!
 |
 |