Strategic Defense Initiative
Posted by RazorsKissJan 24
I’m going to steal shamelessly from the name of the late 80’s “missile defense program”, in my initial offering of an idea.
Now that we’re moderately organized, apologists – we need to start targeting, and spreading out to practice apologetics.
I have a couple theories on how to do so.
1. We need to start “teaming up”.
2. We need to start identifying the people we plan on reaching out to.
3. We need to start identifying the people we need to defend the Gospel from, and to.
So, there’s a few ideas, thrown into the wind. Now, let’s flesh them out.
Teaming up:
I’d like to mention a verse I made in an earlier post: “And if one can overpower him who is alone, two can resist him. A cord of three {strands} is not quickly torn apart.” (Ecclesiastes 4:12)
This concept is especially important to those of us who actively defend the faith – sometimes in hostile settings. I can point to a host of times, in my own experience, where just one single, solitary friendly word worked worlds of encouragement. Even more welcome is a brother or sister, who can stand back to back with you, and assist you – and you him/her. It is invaluable, when debating, defending, or explaining the Word – and even more so in a hostile setting – which is where those of us who are active, offensively (in a tactical sense) minded apologists are likely to be.
I encourage you to find someone, or someones, of a like mind, and a like spirit, to “team up” with, when you do “on the spot” apologetics. On a forum I often debate on, I created a group called “Shade Tree Apologists”, in order to assist the Christians who debate on this forum. It’s proven unbelievably encouraging and effective – because, like that strand of three cords, it is not easily broken. It allows you to have backup, to have a slightly different perspective, an encourager, and a comradeship.
Don’t forget the great bit of wisdom above.
Identifying:
I have a challenge for you. Find at least 3 “secular”, 3 agnostic, or 3 atheistic journals/blogs this week. Pick whichever suits your style of apologetics. Now, start commenting. Get to know them. Interact – make their day. Preferably, find a low traffic blog (especially you higher-ranked bloggers), and make their day even further by giving them a nod in your sidebar.
Several “encouragement” opportunities, and a way to “let your light shine before all men”. See how that works. I’m going to try an experiment, to see how the idea of “salting the blogosphere” works, in practice. Who’s with me? I’ll round up your results in my “Daily Cut” posts, as you do so. That’s the other reason I wanted the aggregator…
Targeting:
Also, I encourage you to find at least one blog with a worldview antithetical to the Christian worldview. Disagree, trackback, and dialogue. At least one “defense” per week should be our goal, in my humble opinion. Don’t you think? Now, not all of us are _active_ apologists. If your gifts correspond to this type of thing – go for it. If they _DO NOT_, ignore this. My opinion, at least. Another option: disagree, trackback, and continue the dialogue blog to blog, instead of in their comments section. I dunno. See what works. It’s an experiment 😀
So… who wants to try this?
6 comments
Comment by Jeff Downs on January 25, 2005 at 8:23 am
Thanks for your comments on this issue. I’ve been working on this type of stuff within the Counter-cult community. The goals of the Evangelical Ministries to New Religions are somewhat the same as you describe. We haven’t been doing much in what you describe and I know I have been a thorn in some sides…to continue to push for these models.
I’ll pass your series along.
Comment by albert on January 26, 2005 at 9:35 am
This is great: blog-to-blog evangelization. I can’t think of another way of describing it.
Comment by Joshua Duncan on January 28, 2005 at 8:18 am
Interesting ideas. We just got started on our blog but definitely want to be more active. I’ll run this link by the team!
Comment by D. Goodmanson on January 28, 2005 at 6:43 pm
How often do people accept Christ through apologetics? Are you using evidential or presuppositional apologetics? I’d be interested in seeing blogs where you’ve had good conversations. Can you post a couple?
Comment by RazorsKiss on January 28, 2005 at 9:12 pm
Well, I’m relatively new to the blogging scene,actually. I’ve only been blogging since March of last year. However, I’ve been doing apologetics a while longer, and apologetic-type debating a lot longer than that.
Although there IS a drive toward evangelism via apologetics, the fundamental purpose/mission of an apologist is to clearly defend the Gospel, Word, and Person of God. The methods can vary from, like you said, evidential, to presuppositional apologetics – but the real “point” of the matter is to defend the faith, ideologically, in as many ways as possible.
I’ve used a blog as a way of “advancing the gospel” – most notably on my old blog – but most of my experience is on forums, and the like. Examples here, here, and here.
How often do people accept Christ through apologetics? Well, ask Josh McDowell, Ravi Zacharias, or the folks at Answers in Genesis. They’d be more qualified than me. However, we ARE called to defend the faith. Not everyone’s particular “suite” of gifts” lends itself to apologetics, and not everyone will be called to it.
*shrug*
Like your blog, by the by.
Comment by mentata on January 30, 2005 at 11:31 pm
This may be a waste of time like SDI was a waste of mondy, but her it is: any time, any place. I love the words of Jesus, and that is why I work to make sure those that continue to twist them to their own ends have somebody to answer to.
This form behaves poorly in some browsers.