This is post number 3 in a series exploring Francis Schaeffer’s book, “The Great Evangelical Disaster.”
As we read last time, the article in Time magazine finished with an amazing statement:
The American Century was to be a century of unleashing, of breaking away, at first from the 19th century … and eventually from any constraints at all. Behind most of these events lay the assumption, almost a moral imperative, that what was not free ought to be free, that limits were intrinsically evil …but … when people or ideas are unfettered, they are freed but not yet free.
Schaeffer continues his analysis of those statements in this section.
Here the problem of the 1920’s to the 1980’s is properly spelled out. It is the attempt to have absolute freedom – to be totally autonomous from any intrinsic limits. It is the attempt to throw off anything that would restrain one’s own personal autonomy. But it is especially a direct and deliberate rebellion against God and His law.
Powerful stuff. When society, or even one person sets themselves up, saying they are intrinsically autonomous, what is that called? Pride.
When pride comes, then comes dishonor, But with the humble is wisdom. (Proverbs 11:2)
For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world. (1 John 2:16)
The problem is this: If there is not a proper balance between form and freedom, then the society will move into either of two extremes. Freedom, without a proper balance of form, will lead to chaos and to a total breakdown of society. Form, without a proper balance of freedom, will lead to authoritarianism, and to the destruction of individual and social freedom. But note further: no society can exist in a state of chaos. And whenever chaos has reigned for even a short time, it has given birth to the imposition of arbitrary control.
Let’s ruminate on this for a minute. Schaeffer is saying that the problem which exists in government, in society, and in every human endeavor is the requirement to balance form with freedom. Read the following and pause for a few minutes, before you go on.
Do a bit of thinking on what that means, and what implications that has on how we view life, and just about everything in it. What does “form” entail? What does “freedom” entail? We value freedom – but we also value structure – or form. Could it be, perhaps, that the balance between those two is really what makes societies what they are? Our lives what they are? Take a minute – stop here. Don’t read further yet. Do some thinking on that for a minute. Then, once you’ve mulled that over for a bit – click “more”.
Read the rest of this entry